Amy Davidson Sorkin is a staff writer at The New Yorker. With a focus on general assignment news, world affairs, and government and politics, she explores a range of topics including lawsuits and national security. Amy has been featured in Magzter, Analytics on Fire Podcast, SCOTUSblog, and NewsBreak, highlighting her diverse contributions to contemporary journalism.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Amy Davidson Sorkin predominantly covers legal policy and regulation, with a focus on US national politics, including coverage of evolving stories and events related to legal cases. Given her emphasis on legal and political topics, she is likely to be responsive to pitches from experts who can provide analysis or commentary on ongoing legal proceedings involving high-profile political figures such as Donald Trump.
Additionally, given the themes covered in her articles, Amy may also be open to pitches that offer insights into government policies and regulations within the United States, particularly those tied to current events and evolving stories within American politics.
When reaching out to Amy Davidson Sorkin it would be beneficial for sources offering expert opinions or insider perspectives on high-profile political/legal matters in the US.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: John Cassidy, Fergus Mcintosh, Susan B. Glasser, Benjamin Wallace-Wells, Jonathan Blitzer, Shannon Sims, Geraldo Cadava, Emily Flake, Ian Crouch, Joshua Yaffa, Amy Davidson Sorkin, Jon Allsop
From the daily newsletter: an interview with Joshua Yaffa about yesterday’s White House meeting.
Kamala Harris almost won in 2024. So why does her new book feel like another defeat?
By: Amy Davidson Sorkin
New books look at the January 6th Trial That Wasn’t and other failed prosecutions—and whether they might have changed history.
| Would the January 6th case, or any of the failed prosecutions of Donald Trump, have made a difference? - BY AMY DAVIDSON SORKIN
Maybe the Justices simply want to reiterate what the Court has already said—or maybe not.
It wasn't the first time that Trump had debased someone who serves him. It wasn't even the first time that Vance had had to downplay a blasphemy-themed A.I. image.
Their electoral prospects are finally improving, but opportunities can quickly give way to divisions. Does the Party have a plan?
A sense of make-believe and avoidance pervades Jill Biden’s memoir about her tenure as First Lady, Amy Davidson Sorkin writes.
.jpg)
By: Amy Davidson Sorkin
The decision that rejected Donald Trump’s attempts to rewrite the Constitution was much too close.
Senator Rand Paul may have approached the matter with theatrics and ill will, but Dr. Anthony Fauci's decision not to testify was a loss.
