Benjamin Wallace-Wells is a staff writer at The New Yorker. He focuses on American politics and society, covering themes such as elections, public policy, and security policy, with a strong background in general assignment news and government. His work has been featured in Magzter, The New Yorker, and the Analytics on Fire Podcast.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Benjamin's coverage spans a wide range of topics, with a predominant focus on government and politics. He frequently explores evolving stories within this realm, indicating an interest in ongoing political developments or policy changes.
As his geographic focus is national (United States), he may be particularly interested in pitches related to U.S. politics and policy decisions at the federal level that have broader implications.
Given Benjamin’s diverse coverage of art, poetry, and specific individuals such as Marjorie Taylor Greene and Mark Ulriksen, he may also be open to well-crafted pitches pertaining to these subjects. However, it's important for contributors to ensure relevance when pitching outside the overarching theme of government & politics.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
During the Trump era, political violence has become an increasingly urgent problem. Elected officials from both parties are struggling to respond.
By: Benjamin Wallace-Wells
“In the Line of Fire: During the Trump era, political violence has become an increasingly urgent problem; Elected officials from both parties are struggling to respond.”
| How do politicians respond to political violence? - BY BENJAMIN WALLACE-WELLS
Was the Vice-President's exclusion from the operation in Venezuela an expression of his anti-interventionist ideology—or a political calculation?
By: Benjamin Wallace-Wells
During the President's second Administration, universal principles such as self-determination and due process are wielded only opportunistically.
By: Benjamin Wallace-Wells
The present mess has roots in two entangled, defining White House projects: DOGE and the mind-bending expansion of ICE.
By: Benjamin Wallace-Wells
The two men might wish that they lived in a world where whoever dropped the most bombs got whatever he wanted. But the war has shown that this isn't true.
The exact reasons are often left vague and the successors to be determined, but people are leaving the Administration—including three Cabinet secretaries.
It's been a tumultuous primary season, but is this the Democrats' Tea Party moment? Or is something more pragmatic emerging?
