By: Benny Nezaj
Opens in a new window Opens an external website Opens an external website in a new window This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. You may change your settings at any time or accept the default settings. You may close this banner to continue with only essential cookies. Privacy Policy Targeted Advertising Personalization Analytics Debate over proposed flock camera restrictions intensifies at Troy City Council meeting Video Player is loading. This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color Transparency Background Color Transparency Window Color Transparency Font Size Text Edge Style Font Family End of dialog window. Advertisement A heated debate over the use of Flock license plate reader cameras continued Thursday night in Troy as city leaders and clashed over a proposed law that would create new restrictions on how the technology can be used. The discussion drew a packed crowd to Troy City Hall, where residents voiced concerns about privacy, surveillance, and transparency surrounding the automatic license plate reader — or ALPR — system currently used by the Troy Police Department. Mayor Carmella Mantello strongly opposed the proposed legislation, arguing the restrictions would make it harder for police to investigate crimes and protect public safety. “This legislation creates unrealistic and dangerous restrictions,” Mantello said during the meeting. The mayor also defended the use of the cameras as an important investigative tool for law enforcement. “You cannot claim to support public safety while simultaneously stripping our law enforcement of the technology they rely on to solve crimes and protect residents,” Mantello said. But many residents who spoke during public comment argued the cameras raise serious civil liberties concerns and could lead to government overreach or misuse of personal data. “I don't think our civil liberties should end where the mayor or cops thinks it makes it more difficult for them to resolve crimes,” said Troy resident Emma Della Pia. “Our civil liberties exist for a reason.” Other speakers questioned whether Flock Safety — the private company behind the camera system — could be trusted with public data. “Flock Safety is a private company. They will never put our collective safety over their profits and market shares,” said Troy resident Fex Cahil. Residents also accused city leaders of failing to provide enough transparency about how the system operates, who has access to the data collected by the cameras, and whether the technology has been effective in reducing crime. The proposed legislation was introduced by Councilmember Bill McKee, who said the measure is intended to balance public safety needs with constitutional privacy protections. “This law would provide the guardrails necessary to protect privacy rights while preserving law enforcement's ability to use the technology to solve crimes,” McKee said. City council members said discussions on the proposal are expected to continue in the coming weeks. A public hearing on the legislation is scheduled for Thursday, June 4.













