Bjorn Lomborg

For years, climate campaigners have claimed that our food supply is under grave threat from climate change caused by excessive fossil fuel use.

As a rare strain of Ebola wreaks havoc in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the World Health Organization is once again mixed up in climate advocacy.

Switch between CA and NY editions here. Something was conspicuously missing from California's primary this month.

Twenty years ago, Al Gore's “An Inconvenient Truth” hit American theaters and rewrote the climate conversation overnight. The film won an Oscar, helped earn Gore a Nobel Prize, and convinced young Americans that civilization was teetering on the brink.

Twenty years ago, Al Gore's “An Inconvenient Truth” hit American theaters and rewrote the climate conversation overnight. The film won an Oscar, helped earn Gore a Nobel Prize, and convinced young Americans that civilization was teetering on the brink.

The real lesson of “An Inconvenient Truth” is that panic makes for lousy policy. Trading the doomsday script for innovation, adaptation and development would save trillions of dollars — and do far more for both people and the planet.

New initiative urges sharper focus on cost-benefit analysis to ensure limited public funds deliver maximum social impact

By weaponizing cherry-picked data and ignoring the far deadlier reality of cold temperatures, the WHO is once again sacrificing evidence-based public health to manufacture a costly, counterproductive climate emergency.

Two decades is long enough to check receipts. The policy playbook the movie inspired has cost U.S. taxpayers and consumers dearly while barely moving

Economic growth has picked up, inflation has eased, and access to schooling has expanded, improving prospects for the future.