Christine Jones

Now able to Pick Release Only Existing Reservations from the Shipping Transactions Form

We are always looking for new articles of interest to the local community.

We are always looking for new articles of interest to the local community.

Brings together two trusted leaders to deliver stronger recovery performance and a better patient financial experience.

While the facts of the decision in Leto v Secretary Department of Customer Service [2026] NSWCATOD 26 (Leto v Secretary) are obviously very specific, an insolvency in an applicant's trading history is frequently...

Audiences are actively seeking out branded content because they are willing to go to those platforms to watch something interesting.

This monthly roundup examines key NSW Supreme Court and District Court decisions interpreting the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, analyzing how courts are applying the legislation's 'pay now, argue later' philosophy in disputes over adjudication determinations, payment claims, and enforcement stays. The decisions address critical issues including interlocutory injunctions, payment schedule validity, and the interplay between interim adjudications and final dispute resolution

This monthly roundup examines three significant NSW court decisions from July 2026 that demonstrate how courts are increasingly scrutinizing the enforcement of Security of Payment Act judgments, particularly when builders face financial difficulties or disputes involve residential construction. The cases reveal evolving judicial approaches to freezing orders, stays of enforcement, and the strict compliance requirements that can make or break a SOP Act claim.

Last year, this proclamation, which is a symbolic commitment to advancing peace, was announced on the stage of the LatinUs Theater in the Pivot Center located on W. 25th Street.

Recent NSW court decisions are establishing new protections for residential owner-occupiers under the Security of Payment Act, with judges granting stays on enforcement where contractors pose insolvency risks. These rulings recognize that residential owners face fundamentally different risks than commercial parties, cushioning the impact of legislation originally designed for business-to-business construction disputes.