India (National)
Not enough data
Indu Bhan's coverage is primarily focused on legal policy, regulation, government announcements with a strong emphasis on Supreme Court decisions and high-profile legal cases in India. She appears to be interested in issues related to tax deductions, arbitration, insolvency, debt recovery among others.
Given this focus, pitches should likely come from professionals knowledgeable about Indian law and court procedures. Individuals with expertise in tax laws or corporate litigation may want to consider reaching out when they have relevant insights into these topics. Additionally, those within the political and governmental sphere could also provide valuable commentary given Indu's interest in government announcements and policies.
Considering her national geographic focus (India), it would be beneficial for sources to tailor their pitches by highlighting relevance specifically within the Indian legal landscape.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Indu Bhan
The Supreme Court ordered Irdai to pilot compulsory third-party insurance for fuel purchases. New four-wheeled vehicles will require four years of coverage, and two-wheelers six years. Police will receive devices to verify insurance status in real time. Automatic number plate recognition cameras will integrate with insurance databases. A four-layer structure for private vehicle insurance policies is also planned.
The Delhi High Court has closed contempt proceedings against SpiceJet's chairman and directors. This action follows their failure to fully comply with a court order.
The Delhi High Court has asked the government for its response on a plea. This plea seeks automatic tax deducted at source refunds for individuals not owing income tax. Currently, these individuals must file an income tax return to claim their refunds. The court is considering directing immediate processing of unclaimed TDS refunds up to ₹5,000. A permanent automatic TDS refund mechanism for future years is also being sought.
The Delhi High Court is reviewing Natco Pharma's challenge to a breast cancer drug patent. Natco alleges Novartis and Astex secured two patents for the same invention. This action, Natco claims, unlawfully extends patent protection for the Ribociclib molecule. The court will first determine the petition's maintainability after legal arguments. The case has been scheduled for further hearing on September 16.
By: Indu Bhan
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has ordered lenders to proceed with prosecuting their officers implicated in a questionable alliance with builders. The court's directive includes the allocation of extra police forces to bolster the CBI's ongoing probe. Additionally, pertinent case details will be handed over to the Enforcement Directorate, as the CBI scrutinizes allegations tied to certain real estate firms.
By: Indu Bhan
Optimism reigns at the Supreme Court over the resolution of the RK Family Trust disagreement. The mediation sessions have navigated smoothly, thanks to the collaborative spirit of the parties involved. The bench acknowledged a preliminary report presented by former CJI DY Chandrachud, urging everyone to enter mediation with a willingness to compromise. Notably, mediator costs will be financed by the family trust, aiming to prevent additional conflicts.
By: Indu Bhan
The Supreme Court declined to halt a Bombay High Court ruling on spectrum charges. This decision impacts Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea regarding past spectrum usage. The High Court had previously quashed the government's ₹3,300 crore demand. This levy was for spectrum held beyond 6.2 MHz between 2008 and 2012. The Centre has now appealed this judgment to the Supreme Court.
By: Indu Bhan
The Bombay High Court had earlier set aside the Department of Telecommunications' (DoT) December 28, 2012 decision and subsequent demand notices imposing the one-time spectrum charge.
By: Indu Bhan
The issue related to a 2016 final partial award of $3.86 billion, including interest, in favour of oil ministry towards cost recovery and reimbursement of royalties and taxes related to the oil and gas fields then operated by Reliance and its partners.
While issuing notice to the government and Fssai, Justice Amit Mahajan said Dabur has made out a prima facie case for grant of stay of Monday's ban order, as such sudden restrictions could not have been imposed without issuing a show-cause notice or hearing the company.
