Jimmy Hoover

Having vastly curtailed the power and autonomy of federal agencies, reining in Congress could emerge as a key area of focus for the U.S. Supreme Court, experts say.

Having vastly curtailed the power and autonomy of federal agencies, reining in Congress could emerge as a key area of focus for the U.S. Supreme Court, experts say. In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, for example, the court will consider whether Congress, in enacting Title IX's antidiscrimination provisions pursuant to its spending powers, created an implied private right of action for employees of federally funded colleges.

A group of Democratic states led by California told the U.S. Court Court on Monday that allowing the presidents mail voting overhaul to proceed would risk widespread voter confusion and potentially disenfranchisement ahead of the November midterm elections.

"This litigation is not an attempt to solve climate change," the city of Boulder and its county commissioners told the Supreme Court. "[I]t merely asks that petitioners bear their fair share of local costs incurred in part because of their tortious conduct."

“We are stumbling down a dark hallway to try to feel out whether there is a door to this room or that room that's unlocked," said Jed Shugerman, a Boston University School of Law professor.

The White House's latest effort to remove Lisa Cook comes after the U.S. Supreme Court found President Donald Trump failed to afford her sufficient process to respond to disputed misconduct allegations against her.

"[T[he injunction meddles in 'the workings of ' the Executive Branch, preventing it from even trying to lawfully implement the order," the court said in a per curiam decision.

"The D.C. Circuit should not have the last judicial word on this cornerstone of the President’s immigration policy," the Trump administration wrote in its high-court petition.

"The D.C. Circuit should not have the last judicial word on this cornerstone of the president's immigration policy," the Trump administration wrote in its high court petition.

The majority "does a disservice to all concerned by distorting Article III standing and ripeness principles to issue a ruling that contributes to preelection chaos instead of quashing it, and by using its equitable authority to facilitate a patently inequitable result," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in her solo dissent.