Karandeep Singh

Android updates used to redefine the experience. Android 17 shows why those days are behind us — and why that's actually a good thing.

Published Jul 2, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT I am a Senior Author at XDA with a decade of experience covering consumer tech. I care more about the impact of technology on people’s everyday lives than the superfluous features companies keep adding each year, which is central to my reviews and product recommendations.

I want to recommend Moto G phones again, but Motorola needs to fix five long-standing issues before I'd consider buying another one.

Introduction: Short dental implants have been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to standard implants for rehabilitation of posterior edentulous regions with limited bone availability. However, concerns remain regarding their long-term survival and risk of failure compared to standard-length implants. This study aimed to compare the survival and failure rates of short (<10 mm) and standard (≥10 mm) dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla and mandible.Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 207 patients who received 363 dental implants in the posterior jaw. The implants were categorized as short implants (<10 mm; n = 141) and standard implants (≥10 mm; n = 222). Demographic characteristics, implant-related variables, and clinical outcomes were retrieved from the patient records. Implant failure, survival rates, and the influence of jaw location on implant outcomes were assessed. Statistical analyses included chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, independent-samples t-tests, and odds ratio calculations. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: The mean age of the study population was 52.1 ± 10.5 years, with 142 (68.6%) males and 65 (31.4%) females. Overall, implant failure was significantly higher among short implants than among standard implants (p < 0.001). Standard implants demonstrated significantly lower odds of failure than short implants (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.15-0.57). In the maxilla, the failure rates were 18 (28.6%) for short implants and 8 (8.5%) for standard implants (p = 0.002), whereas in the mandible, the corresponding rates were 10 (12.8%) and 7 (5.5%), respectively (p = 0.110). The cumulative survival rates were lower for short implants as compared to standard implants.Conclusion: Standard dental implants demonstrated significantly higher survival rates and lower failure rates than short implants in posterior jaw rehabilitation. Although short implants remain a useful treatment option in anatomically restricted sites, careful case selection is necessary, particularly in the posterior maxilla, where the risk of failure appears to be greater.

Stop handing out your real email address. These five email alias services help reduce spam, improve privacy, and protect your primary inbox.

Most people focus on passwords alone. Here's why email aliases, password managers, and 2FA form the complete security package.

ChatGPT Atlas is shutting down, but AI browsers are just getting started. Here are five of the best AI web browsers you can try instead.

Gemini has improved dramatically, but I still can't cancel my ChatGPT subscription. These are the five shortcomings holding it back.

Rising memory prices and costly storage upgrades are making a compelling case for the return of microSD cards to smartphones.

Published Aug 4, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT I am a Senior Author at XDA with a decade of experience covering consumer tech. I care more about the impact of technology on people’s everyday lives than the superfluous features companies keep adding each year, which is central to my reviews and product recommendations.