Pamela King is a Legal Editor at E&E News. She leads the coverage of environmental litigation at the Supreme Court and beyond, focusing on the intersection of law, energy, and environmental issues, including the impacts of fossil fuel extraction on communities and ecosystems. Pamela's work has been featured in Scientific American, POLITICO, Daily Climate, and other prominent publications.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
Not enough data
Pamela King's coverage is primarily focused on legal policy and regulation with an emphasis on the Supreme Court, government, environmental issues, and legal cases. She appears to be particularly interested in developments related to agency power, environmental law battles, and the implications of Supreme Court rulings.
Given her focus on legal policy and regulation with a strong emphasis on the Supreme Court and governmental announcements, she would likely welcome pitches from experts who can provide insightful analysis or commentary on ongoing legal cases or regulatory changes within these areas.
Sources who have direct knowledge of specific legal cases or legislative processes may be especially valuable for Pamela's coverage. Additionally, given her interest in environmental issues such as pollution control and clean water regulations, experts with expertise in these areas could also provide valuable insights for her articles.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
The ordinance would affect a Black community already heavily burdened by pollution.
The Supreme Court recently expanded limits on agency power. A new challenge asks the justices to take the next step.
While Todd Blanche was second in command at DOJ, the department saw a mass exodus of its career environmental attorneys.
Footage shows Judge Ryan Nelson, a Trump appointee, knocked off a man's glasses and stomped on them during a recent confrontation.
Conservation groups have asked the justices to find that a California drainage project requires a federal water permit.
The order stopped short of requiring the agency to implement the program.
Some Supreme Court justices might be receptive to the Trump administration’s argument.
By: Pamela King, Marcia Brown
The ruling is also a victory for the Trump administration and a defeat for the Make America Healthy Again movement.
The ruling is also a victory for the Trump administration and a defeat for the Make America Healthy Again movement.
The administration backed the weed killer manufacturer's winning argument against cancer lawsuits — over MAHA's objections.
