Prakash Nanda is an Author and Veteran Journalist at the Eurasian Times and Indian Century Media Group. With nearly three decades of experience, he focuses on Indian politics, foreign policy, and strategic affairs, often exploring themes related to energy policy, nuclear energy, and international relations across Asia and the Pacific. He has been featured in India News Network, RealClearDefense, and EurAsian Times.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
Not enough data
Prakash Nanda's coverage revolves around international relations, military conflict, defense industry, and geopolitics. His focus on government announcements and legal policy regulation indicates a preference for analysis of official statements and regulations.
For effective outreach to Prakash, consider providing expert commentary or insights into global tensions, military conflicts, geopolitical developments or the defense industry. Additionally, sources with knowledge of international relations policies and their impact on global affairs would likely be well-received by him.
As he covers topics related to world affairs with a particular emphasis on government & politics from various countries worldwide, pitches should encompass diverse perspectives from different regions to align with his broad thematic scope.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Prakash Nanda
It is increasingly becoming obvious that US President Donald Trump has to talk more to his friend Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, rather than to his other friend, President Xi Jinping of China, to stop helping Iran that enables not only the survival of the regime in Tehran but also the basic maintenance of its military prowess to withstand, first the American/Israeli attacks and then the military blockade.
By: Prakash Nanda
Is China a constraining factor in an otherwise growing India- South Korea Defense Cooperation? This question has assumed relevance in the context of the just-concluded visit to the Republic of Korea (ROK), better known as South Korea, by Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh. But before attempting an answer to the question, certain facts need to […]
By: Prakash Nanda
Though it is highly unlikely that the United Kingdom will regain its 19th-century superpower status, when “the Sun never set in the British Empire”, there is now a strong school of thought shared among the strategic elites of 10 Nordic and Baltic countries of Europe that London must lead in defending Europe against any Russian misadventure, leveraging its nuclear capabilities, a permanent UN Security Council seat, intelligence networks, and leading global hub in Artificial Intelligence.
By: Prakash Nanda
President Donald Trump may have a point when he periodically asserts that the United States is the world's foremost military power, given the precision, stealth, networking, and cutting-edge technology of the American weapons. But are these enough to fight a long war, unless stored in plenty or replenished easily?
By: Prakash Nanda
Should political imperatives or military necessities factor in determining who will lead the troops of two allies in the event of a war?
By: Prakash Nanda
With US aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt about to deploy a Seahawk medium unmanned surface vessel (MUSV) as part of its strike group for the first time, the day does not seem far off when the modern navies of the world redefine doctrine, design, and the economics of sea control.
By: Prakash Nanda
It now seems that any possible agreement between the United States and Iran is not dependent on the guarantee of Tehran's security or the unfreezing of its assets held by Washington. Nor is it linked to US President Donald Trump's satisfaction with the nature and pace of Iran's nuclearization.
By: Prakash Nanda
This question is prominently appearing in the Turkish media these days. Though it has not been raised officially by Ankara, Turkish defense experts seem alarmed by India's rapidly expanding security partnerships with Greece and Cyprus, which are at the center of some of Ankara's most sensitive geopolitical disputes.
By: Prakash Nanda
As expected, today's proposed talks in Geneva between Iran and the US have been postponed. After none other than US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed the 14-point memorandum of understanding (MoU) electronically at Versailles in France yesterday, it seems there was really no need for another signing ceremony in Geneva.
By: Prakash Nanda
While the implementation of the recent 14-point Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the United States and Iran remains a work in progress, the fact that pledges of $300 billion for Iran's reconstruction do not earmark funds for environmental remediation has not impressed ecologists and environmentalists around the world.
