Sarah Little is a Senior Staff Writer at Screen Rant. With six years of experience in entertainment journalism, she has a strong focus on network TV, writing reviews for shows like The Rookie and engaging in debates about popular series such as Will Trent. Sarah's work has been featured in notable publications including Showbiz Cheat Sheet, VICE Media, and Forbes.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Sarah Little specializes in entertainment news, particularly movies and TV shows. She seems to focus on providing explanations for plot developments, analyzing casting choices, and exploring unanswered questions from popular films and series.
If you're reaching out to Sarah, consider offering behind-the-scenes insights into film production or exclusive interviews with actors. Additionally, if you have unique perspectives on the impact of specific entertainment industry events or trends (e.g., award ceremonies), she might find that valuable for her coverage.
Given the nature of Sarah's articles which often explain specific elements of movies and TV shows, she may be interested in detailed information about characters' storylines or how certain scenes were filmed.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Sarah Little
Apple TV has a new show for Slow Horses fans.
A select few limited series are flawless.
Reacher is good, but it’s not the best action show.
By: Sarah Little
Pennywise the Clown has taken some pretty strange forms over the years, but how he appears in It: Welcome to Derry 's second episode is undoubtedly the most peculiar.
Disney+ features many holiday films outside the classics.
You might be missing out on one of Peacock's best features.
By: Sarah Little
If you haven't watched it, you're missing out on epic holiday fun.
One of TV's biggest series is leaving Netflix in the new year.
Check out this cozy and festive show to get in the holiday spirit.
By: Michelle Maden, Rhiannon Corcoran, Sarah Little, Selina Wallis, Juanita Charles, Pauline Slade, Elizabeth Perkins, Helen Mulholland, Paul Marshall, Leanne Burton, Ruaraidh Hill, Shaima Hassan, Mary Gemma Cherry
Objectives Miscarriage, defined in the UK as loss of pregnancy prior to 24 weeks gestation, can have long-term psychological implications. Clinical guidelines for perinatal bereavement care do not provide guidance on how best to support the mental health of women, and their partners, after miscarriage. Peer support (support from those who share common characteristics) is often sought, but there is little understanding of its access and use. We conducted a systematic review to understand the barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of peer support to improve mental health outcomes for parents after miscarriage.Design Systematic review and thematic synthesis.Data sources A comprehensive systematic search across nine databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science (all databases), EMBASE, CENTRAL, LENS.org, British Nursing Index and Health Management Information Consortium) was conducted in June 2025. Grey literature was identified through website searching, contact with topic experts and a national Call for Evidence.Eligibility criteria Qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring motivations, experiences and preferences for peer support after miscarriage were included.Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen, extract and code included studies. Suitable studies were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist. Findings were extracted and subjected to a thematic synthesis.Results Across nine studies included in the review, three overarching themes were developed, with seven subthemes, capturing both barriers and facilitators. ‘Engaging in relational recognition’ reflects the validation and connection that arise through experiential resonance, often heightened by the context of exclusion from broader social or clinical support. ‘Mechanisms of Communality’ describe how communality is enacted through dynamic peer interactions, including modelling and facilitating grief, benchmarking physical change and mattering through reciprocity, highlighting mutual support and shared coping. ‘Dynamics of Access’ consider factors which shape engagement, including changing needs of individuals across time and modalities of support and their effects.Conclusions These findings form the first synthesis of peer support after miscarriage and bring a nuanced service user perspective of barriers and facilitators by examining evidence from diverse studies. Peer support after miscarriage was seen to be a dynamic, relational process shaped by shared experience, mutual exchange and context-specific factors. Findings underscore key policy and practice considerations, including the use of trauma-informed, loss-sensitive approaches and consideration of intersectionality, that should be reflected when offering peer support services, with and for, those who have experienced miscarriage.PROSPERO registration number CRD42024518248.No data are available.
