The concern raised by David Strauss’s Essay might be addressed by positing an alternative, broader conception of judicial review than the one he proposes, which is inspired by the influential footnote in the Carolene Products case. My alternative view on the scope and nature of judicial review doe
The California Law Review is the flagship law journal of the University of California, Berkeley, and stands as a respected platform for scholarly legal discourse. It publishes in-depth articles, essays, and commentary on a wide range of legal topics, with particular attention to issues involving legal policy, regulation, and government announcements. The content is authored by leading academics, practitioners, and students who contribute rigorous analysis on contemporary legal challenges.
Its readership primarily includes law scholars, practitioners, policymakers, students, and anyone interested in advanced discussions of legal theory and practice. The journal's reputation ensures that its work is often cited in academic research as well as judicial opinions.
Coverage extends beyond traditional print articles to include online digital publications and podcasts. This multi-platform approach allows the California Law Review to engage with its audience through both long-form scholarship and more accessible audio content.
By leveraging these diverse media outlets—scholarly articles in print or online formats alongside podcasts—the publication maintains relevance within both academic circles and broader public conversations about law and policy.
