Law & Legal Affairs

Legal PR

Whether you’re a law firm spearheading a legal dispute that’s making headlines or a lawyer looking to boost your credibility, you need legal PR. Below you’ll find law journalists and publications to contact. Plus, you can track legal PR trends to inform your tone and approach.

Legal PR Pitch Ideas

  • Federal Circuit's reinstatement boosts trade secret protection in technology litigation
    Pitch Now
  • Insurance court ruling clarifies excess liability in environmental contamination cases
    Pitch Now
  • Intellectual property litigation stakes rise with Versata and Ford Motor verdict
    Pitch Now
  • Regulatory actions reshape employment practices and professional conduct standards
    Pitch Now
  • New Jersey court enhances cannabis-related employment rights with landmark decision
    Pitch Now
  • Legal profession faces heightened scrutiny amid solicitor bullying appeal case
    Pitch Now

Preston Insights

The recent legal landscape has been marked by significant developments in intellectual property and insurance coverage disputes. Notably, the Versata Software v. Ford Motor case has gained attention as the Federal Circuit reinstated an $82 million jury verdict, allowing trade secret plaintiffs to seek unjust enrichment damages based on a defendant's gains from misappropriated technology. This decision could potentially expose Ford Motor Co. to up to $1 billion in additional damages, highlighting the ongoing complexities and financial stakes involved in intellectual property litigation. Additionally, the Indiana Court of Appeals addressed a crucial insurance coverage dispute in Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co. v. American Commercial Barge Line, LLC, where the court ruled on the obligations of excess liability insurers concerning environmental contamination liabilities, emphasizing the intricate nature of insurance claims related to environmental issues.

In regulatory and employment law, the New Jersey Appellate Court's decision in Sanders v. The Levari Group, LLC marks a pivotal moment for cannabis-related employment rights. The court held that applicants and employees denied employment due to positive cannabis tests can sue under the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance, and Market Modernization Act (CREAMMA), establishing an implied private right of action against non-compliant employers. This ruling underscores the evolving legal framework surrounding cannabis use and employment rights. Furthermore, the Solicitors Regulation Authority's decision to appeal a sanction imposed on a bullying solicitor reflects ongoing efforts to address professional misconduct within the legal profession. These developments indicate a broader trend of increasing scrutiny and regulatory action in both employment practices and professional conduct standards.

Preston Insights are generated by our in-house AI models. Our models are designed by experts to analyze and summarize thousands of current articles from our database on the topic of this page. We've selected articles from top-tier, US publications, and top niche publications for each industry. The results are up-to-date and manually verified by PR experts.

Preston Insights are generated by our in-house AI models. Our models are designed by experts to analyze and summarize hundreds of current articles from our database on the topic of this page. We've selected articles by top-tier, US publications, and top niche publications for each industry. The results are up-to-date and manually verified by PR experts.