India (National)
Not enough data
Ausaf Ayyub's coverage predominantly focuses on legal policy regulation, particularly arbitration-related matters within India. Given this focus, he is likely to be responsive to pitches offering insights and analysis from legal experts specializing in arbitration laws and regulations in India.
The articles indicate a specific interest in rulings and interpretations by the Delhi High Court, so a pitch emphasizing expertise or commentary related to such developments would likely align with his coverage. It's essential for sources reaching out to understand the nuances of Indian arbitration law and how it interacts with broader legal frameworks.
As Ausaf Ayyub appears focused on national (India) content, pitches should reflect an understanding of Indian legal systems and their unique characteristics when relevant.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
The Bench of Justice H.S. Thangkhiew of Meghalaya High Court has held that the mandate of the arbitral tribunal can only be extended by the High Court under Section 29A of the A&C Act if the tribunal was constituted pursuant to the directions issued by the Court under Section 11(6) of the Act.
The High Court of Delhi has held that an arbitration clause contained in the terms and conditions available on the website of a company would get incorporated in the agreement between the parties if the agreement makes an express reference and provide a hyperlink to T&Cs.
The High Court of Gujarat has held that after an award is delivered by the arbitrator, it can entertain an application under Section 33 of the A&C Act and correct any typographical errors or provide an interpretation on the award by making an additional award.
By: Ausaf Ayyub
The Calcutta High Court has held that while hearing a post award application under Section 9 of the A&C Act, the Court would not have the jurisdiction to decide on the correctness of the award.The...
By: Ausaf Ayyub
The High Court of Calcutta has held that the Court under Section 9 of the A&C Act can punish for the disobedience of its order. It held that its power under Section 9 is similar to the Civil...
Allahabad High Court Court Under Section 19 Of MSMED Act, 2006 Empowered To Allow Predeposit In Installments: Allahabad High Court Case Title: M/S Docket Care Systems vs M/S Hariwill...
Allahabad High Court Allahabad High Court Directs Inquiry Against Officers Who Failed To File Arbitration Appeals Within Prescribed Limitation Case Title: Executive Engineer Drainage Division v. Ms Ayush Construction And Another [APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 89 of 2024] The Allahabad High Court has directed...
The Delhi High Court has called for an explanation from Secretary to the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee as to why the Committee failed to provide legal aid to a poor litigant despite several requests.
The inaugural ceremony of the Arbitration Bar of India (ABI) marked a significant milestone in the legal landscape of the country. Distinguished personalities from the legal fraternity attended...
By: Abhisaar Bairagi, Milind Sharma, Ausaf Ayyub
INTRODUCTION The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 (Arbitration Act) was enacted with the aim of providing an efficient and expeditious
(833) 317-6278 
