Cydney Posner

Here are a few interesting snippets regarding shareholder proposals and Item 1.05 Form 8-K from this week's 2024 Proxy Disclosure & 21st Annual Executive Compensation Conferences from CCR Corp.

Are you ever surprised that more companies don’t fail their say-on-pay votes? Say on pay was adopted by the SEC under a Dodd-Frank mandate signed into law against the backdrop of the 2008 financial crisis. The mandate was enacted largely in reaction to the public’s railing against the runaway levels of compensation paid to some corporate executives despite poor performance by their companies, especially when those firms were viewed as contributors to the crisis itself. Say on pay was expected to help rein in excessive levels of compensation and, even though the vote was advisory only, ascribe some level of accountability to boards and compensation committees that set executive compensation levels. But, while say on pay may have driven more investor engagement—certainly a good thing—the anticipated say-on-pay challenge by shareholders to out-of-line pay packages did not really materialize. From the get-go, the average failure rate has only been about 2%. Instead, say-on-pay votes have served largely as confirmations of board decisions regarding executive compensation and not, in most cases, as the kind of rock-throwing exercises that many companies had feared and some governance activists had hoped. According to a 2011 Business Week article, Robert A.G. Monks, who founded ISS in 1985, concluded that say on pay was “‘at best a diversion and at worst a deception….You only have the appearance of reform, and it’s a cruel hoax.’” This paper, Failed Say on Pay: How Do Companies Course Correct after to a ‘No’ Vote?, from the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University, with authors from Stanford and Equilar, looked at the 2% that fail the vote and what they did in response to pass muster with investors. But the underlying message is reflected in the authors’ questions: “Does this process reflect a healthy dynamic of the market correcting egregious practices, or does it simply reflect a standardization process whereby observed outlier practices are brought in line with industry norms? Do the changes companies make in response to a failed vote lead to substantive improvement in the managerial incentives of their pay programs?”

On Tuesday, the SEC announced settled charges against four companies for “making materially misleading disclosures regarding cybersecurity risks and intrusions.

There's been a lot of attention lately to the use of ESG metrics as incentives in executive compensation, perhaps because the concept of ESG has

The title of PwC’s new 2024 Corporate Directors’ Survey, Uncertainty and transformation in the modern boardroom, might clue you in to one of its...

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

In this fraught election season and just before tomorrow’s important election day, the Center for Political Accountability has released its annual...

In this fraught election season and just before tomorrow's important election day , the Center for Political Accountability has released its annual

Given the impending change in Administration in D.C.—and all that portends for regulation—the States may, in many ways, take on much larger significance.

But not to the SEC. Reuters is reporting that former SEC Chair Jay Clayton “is in talks for several potential roles” in the new Administration,...