Jay Adkisson is a Managing Partner at Riser Adkisson LLP. He specializes in law and legal affairs, with a focus on litigation, finance, and real estate, covering topics such as lawsuits, commercial real estate, and credit health. Jay's insights and expertise have been featured in publications including Business Times Journal and Forbes.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Jay Adkisson's coverage largely focuses on legal policy regulation, particularly in the areas of finance, taxation, and business law. He also covers government announcements related to these topics.
Given his focus on legal and financial matters, Jay would likely be interested in commentary or insights from experts in these fields regarding recent regulatory changes or significant cases impacting finance, taxation, bankruptcy laws, and business regulations. Sources with direct experience dealing with the intersection of bankruptcy law and charging order law could offer valuable perspectives for potential outreach.
Considering his extensive coverage of legal policy regulation mostly within the United States' context (although not exclusively), reaching out with expertise related to U.S. financial laws and regulations may be especially relevant to him.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
We've previously talked about the problems with New York's limited liability law in relation to opinions entered in 79 Madison and 245 Park
Ohio appeals court held UPEPA special motions require a hearing, reversing a trial court that denied an Anti-SLAPP motion without one.
Virginia court rules charging orders are the exclusive remedy against LLC interests, barring foreclosure under state law even for single-member LLCs.
By: Jay Adkisson
Back in 2014, Richard Gonzalez was a sergeant in the Town of Dover, New Jersey, police department. Gonzalez sued the Town of Dover for discrimination and retaliation.
By: Jay Adkisson
NC appeals court affirms charging order against Delaware LLC, ruling personal jurisdiction over the debtor suffices. Debtor-friendly formation state myths busted.
A recent bankruptcy court ruling in *Beaumier v. Raley* clarified creditor obligations regarding charging orders and automatic stays. Kathi Raley filed a charging order application against debtors' oil and gas payments before they filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Antero Resources, the payor, withheld funds. After discharge, debtors sued Raley for violating the automatic stay and discharge injunction, as Antero continued withholding. The court ruled Raley did not violate either. It found that in West Virginia, a mere application for a charging order does not create a lien, thus imposing no duty on Raley to withdraw it post-petition or post-discharge. The automatic stay halts proceedings but doesn't compel creditors to undo pre-petition filings without operative effect. This contrasts with garnishments, where affirmative action is often required. The case highlights state-specific differences in charging order effects and advises creditors to seek court clarification to avoid risk.
By: Jay Adkisson
Debunking the viral 3-layer asset protection plan for real estate investors: Why revocable trusts and LLCs offer flawed security against creditors.
Illinois court clarifies LLC charging orders: Entities have limited standing to object, and prior alter ego trust rulings can bind debtors via collateral estoppel.
Does a successful UPEPA motion prove a lawsuit is frivolous? Explore the interplay between Anti-SLAPP laws and Rule 11 sanctions in Hallums v. Alston.
Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe has signed the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA) into law, establishing a modern Anti-SLAPP measure. This legislation significantly enhances protections for free speech, safeguarding journalists, online critics, and those commenting on governmental affairs from abusive litigation. Unlike the previous limited statute, UPEPA provides broad coverage for constitutional speech rights. It allows for a "special motion" to quickly dismiss unmeritorious lawsuits, halting proceedings and awarding attorney fees to successful defendants. This new law, adopted by 15 other states, aims to deter attempts to silence free expression and resolve related disputes more efficiently, offering Missourians robust new protections.
