Jonathan Bennett is a versatile journalist who writes for various publications including Hackaday, Broadway.com, and Human Resource Executive. His work has also been featured in Telepictures Productions Inc. and Magzter. Jonathan covers a wide range of topics including technology, security, finance, and entertainment.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Jonathan Bennett's coverage spans a variety of technology-related topics, with an emphasis on software and SaaS, as well as security issues. He also covers personal stories such as interviews and Broadway updates.
When pitching to Jonathan, consider offering insights or expertise related to the latest developments in software, cybersecurity trends, or other industry-specific technological advancements. Additionally, given his interest in interviews and personal stories within the technology space, he may be open to pitches featuring compelling narratives from individuals within the tech industry or those impacted by its developments.
Given that Jonathan does not have a specific geographic focus but rather covers broad industry-specific themes, ensure that your pitch provides globally relevant content without geographical limitations.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Jonathan Bennett
Depending on who you ask, the big news this week is that quantum computing researchers out of China have broken RSA. And that’s true… sort of. There are multiple caveats, like the fact that this proof of concept is only factoring a 22-bit key. The minimum RSA size in use these days is 1024 bits. The other important note is that this wasn’t done on a general purpose quantum computer, but on a D-Wave quantum annealing machine.
This week Jonathan Bennett and David Ruggles chat with James Smith about Manyfold, the self-hosted 3D print digital asset manager that’s on the Fediverse! Does it do live renders? Does it sli…
By: Jonathan Bennett, Donna Kelce
Cookie Notice and Privacy Policy to learn more. We and our partners process data to provide:
This week, Jonathan Bennett and Dan Lynch chat with Josh Bressers, VP of Security at Anchore, and host of the Open Source Security and Hacker History podcasts. We talk security, SBOMs, and how Josh almost became a Sun fan instead of a Linux geek.
This week, Jonathan Bennett and Randal Schwartz chat with Daniel Stenberg about curl! How many curl installs are there?! What’s the deal with CVEs? How has curl managed to not break its ABI for 18 years straight? And how did Daniel turn all this into a career instead of just a hobby? Watch to find out!
By: Jonathan Bennett
Steve Ballmer famously called Linux “viral”, with some not-entirely coherent complaints about the OS. In a hilarious instance of life imitating art, Windows machines are now getting attacked through malicious Linux VM images distributed through phishing emails.
By: Jonathan Bennett
This week, Jonathan Bennett and David Ruggles chat with Frank Delporte about Pi4J, the friendly Java libraries for the Raspberry Pi, that expose GPIO, SPI, I2C and other IO interfaces. Why would anyone want to use Java for the Pi? And what’s changed since the project started? Listen to find out!
This week starts off with examinations of a couple hardware attacks that you might have considered impractical. Take a Ball Grid Array (BGA) NAND removal attack, for instance. The idea is that a NAND chip might contain useful information in the form of firmware or hard-coded secrets.
By: Jonathan Bennett
This week, Jonathan Bennett, Randal Schwartz, and Aaron Newcomb chat about Linux, the challenges with using system modules like the Raspberry Pi, challenges with funding development, and more!
The world of security research is no stranger to the phenomenon of not-a-vulnerability. That’s where a security researcher finds something interesting, reports it to the project, and it turns out that it’s something other than a real security vulnerability. There are times that this just means a researcher got over-zealous on reporting, and didn’t really understand what was found. There is at least one other case, the footgun.
(833) 317-6278 
