Kate Anderson is a Deputy Editor at Fintech. She focuses on a range of topics including social issues, consumer rights, and environmental concerns, with particular attention to events and conferences in the publishing and media sectors. Kate's work has been featured in notable publications such as LifeSiteNews, The Daily Wire, and Yahoo News.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Kate Anderson's articles predominantly focus on government & politics, with a strong emphasis on legal and regulatory aspects. She covers evolving stories related to governmental announcements and changes in the law.
Considering her coverage attributes, Kate is likely to be receptive to pitches from experts in fields such as law, political science, or public policy who can provide analysis or commentary on legal and political developments. Additionally, professionals with insights into controversial social issues like gender transitioning and abortion laws could capture her interest.
Given her national geographic focus (United States), sources providing perspectives relevant to U.S. policies or regulations are more likely to resonate with Kate.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Kate Anderson
Thanks to an inspiring challenge, I’m writing this column just after my first four miles on a mountain bike all summer long. The motivation behind my bike ride is the Bear River Health Department’s “Bike to Work” commuting challenge, which started Monday and lasts all week (See brhdut.gov for more info or to sign up- there are prizes!).
By: Keagan Hyslop, Kate Anderson
A fundamental principle of South African company law is “ majority rules ” – shareholders and directors are bound by the decisions of the majority even where such decisions are not in their interest. However, recognising the potential for unfair abuse of such a principle, the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) devised section 163, which allows a director or shareholder of a company to apply to court for relief from oppressive conduct of the company or a person related to it that unfairly disregards or prejudices the interests of the applicant. Section 163 therefore paints the picture of a majority shareholder abusing its ability to control the company to unfairly bully or oppress minority shareholders. But what happens if the shareholders are equals – can a 50/50 shareholder be oppressed by their equal? This was the question before the High Court in Van der Watt v Schoeman and Others [2024] 91 SA 531 (ECGq).
The front entrance of Missouri Botanical Garden, which sits in the Shaw neighborhood of St. Louis, Sept. 29, 2024.
Please be aware that Cache Valley Publishing does not endorse, and is not responsible for alleged employment offers in the comments.
Jan Krava/Shutterstock Authors Rose (Shiqi) Luo Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University
By: Rich Harvey, Michael Rieger, Kate Anderson
Reporters can help people see the forest, even when the trees are on fire.
Last updated on December 25, 2024 Kate Anderson Fair Review Practices under the Omnibus Directive
By: Kate Anderson
President Joe Biden's Department of Justice (DOJ) doubled down on its decision not to release the tape of Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur in a legal opinion publicly released before the new year.
Make things easier with to automatically spot inactive members, group them by how long they've been gone, and send them the right incentives to come back.
By: Kate Anderson
2024 Achievements at a Glance 2024 was a year that proved the power of meaningful connections between brands and their customers.
(833) 317-6278 
