Kelsey Dallas is an Assistant Managing Editor at the Deseret News. She covers religion, sports, and the Supreme Court, with a focus on law and legal affairs, including court proceedings and legal reform. Dallas has been featured in notable outlets such as Yahoo News, MSN, and SCOTUSblog.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
Not enough data
Kelsey Dallas primarily covers local sports, particularly the Utah Jazz and high school athletes, as well as stories related to religion. Her focus on event coverage, government announcements, evolving stories, legal policy regulation and citing data suggests she is likely interested in pitches that provide unique perspectives or access to local events and breaking news related to sports or religious topics.
Given her interest in local politics (Utah), any pitches relating to this area should consider how they intersect with Kelsey's main focuses of sports and religion. For example, a story about legislation affecting the relationship between sports organizations and religious groups might be of particular interest.
When reaching out for coverage consideration from Kelsey Dallas it would be beneficial for sources to offer insights into these areas while taking into account her specific geographic focus on Utah.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
When must justices recuse themselves over family members’ acts?
We are thrilled to announce new SCOTUSblog merch, just in time for the heart of opinion season. There are premium hats and tees in exciting colors – ready to ship nationwide. Check them out here
The NBA and NHL finals and World Cup may be dominating sports news right now, but some of us still want to talk about baseball. And as reporter Matt Rice noted on X this week, Justices Potter Stewart and Harry Blackmun would have approved.
We have reached the halfway point of June, meaning the justices have just over two weeks left to wrap up the current term if they want to begin their summer recess in early July. We are awaiting 20 more opinions in argued cases.
Plus, the justices denied several notable petitions for review on Monday.
We’re now just three weeks away from our term-in-review event at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center, which will take place on July 8 from 2:30 to 5:30 p.m. EDT. The event will feature a fireside chat with the ACLU’s Cecillia Wang, who argued the birthright citizenship case
As we noted in Monday’s newsletter, we are expecting 20 more opinions in argued cases by early July. The court has indicated that one or more will come today, and we will be live blogging
By: Kevin Dietsch
A divided Supreme Court on Thursday clarified the scope of a doctrine limiting lower federal courts’ authority to review state-court judgments. In an opinion from Justice Sonia Sotomayor in T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp., the court, by a vote of 5-4, held that the status of a challenged state-court judgment – specifically, whether it is a final decision from the highest court of a state or, instead, “is subject to further review in state appellate proceedings” – is not relevant in determining whether a federal district court can weigh in.
In recognition of Juneteenth, this is an abridged edition of SCOTUStoday.
Welcome to what will likely be a busy week at the Supreme Court. We’re expecting 17 more opinions by early July, and we know that there will be at least two opinion announcement days this week.
