Mahima Khatri

Sacubitril/valsartan is a drug commonly prescribed for the management of hypertension. However, the complete understanding of its efficacy and safety as an antihypertensive agent remains a subject of ongoing investigation. To address this gap, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in relation to olmesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). A thorough search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that could contribute to this meta-analysis. The selected studies were evaluated for their efficacy and safety parameters, including mean sitting and ambulatory blood pressure measurements, common side effects, adverse events, and drug discontinuation rates. A total of eight studies, involving 4488 hypertensive patients, were included in this analysis. Among the participants, 63.5% were administered sacubitril/valsartan, while 36.5% received olmesartan. The analysis revealed significant changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MsSBP), mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MsDBP), and mean sitting pulse pressure (MsPP) favoring sacubitril/valsartan, with p-values <0.00001, 0.07, and <0.00001, respectively. Additionally, sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated a significant reduction in mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (MaSBP), mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (MaDBP), and mean ambulatory pulse pressure (MaPP) with p-values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.02, respectively. However, it is important to note that safety outcomes indicated that sacubitril/valsartan was associated with slightly less favorable results compared to olmesartan. This meta-analysis highlights that sacubitril/valsartan exhibits superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure parameters compared to olmesartan in hypertensive patients. Nevertheless, its safety profile appears to be slightly less favorable. To reinforce these findings and provide more robust evidence, further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted in the future. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers seeking to make informed decisions regarding antihypertensive treatment options.

Fungal infections constitute a common dermatological illness rampant in underdeveloped countries. Combination drug therapy is becoming increasingly well-established owing to drug resistance because of monotherapy. Different studies have been conducted previously to compare the medical regimens for the treatment of fungal infections. However, there is insufficient research on the difference in cure rates and recurrence rates with each regimen. To the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first to compare the effect of the most widely used oral antifungal medications and their combination usage. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assesses the efficacy of terbinafine or itraconazole monotherapy versus combination therapy in fungal diseases. We queried PubMed and Cochrane Central from their inception to April 2022 for published studies, RCTs, and observational studies without any language restriction that compared itraconazole and terbinafine combination therapy with monotherapy in patients with fungal infections. The results from the studies were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and were pooled using a random-effects model, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant for the analysis. Endpoints of interest included cure rates and recurrence rates. Cure rates were increased significantly for combination therapy compared to terbinafine monotherapy (RR=2.01 (1.37, 2.94); p=0.0003; I2=67%). On sensitivity analysis, a significant association was observed between combination therapy and itraconazole monotherapy in terms of cure rates (RR=1.91 (1.41, 2.57); p<0.0001; I2=0%) and recurrence rates (RR=0.08 (0.02, 0.44); p=0.003; I2=0%). The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that itraconazole and terbinafine combination therapy has a better cure rate when compared to terbinafine monotherapy.

This narrative review explores the evolving field of thyroid function testing, explicitly highlighting the significance of precision diagnostics and their substantial impact on clinical practice. Commencing with a comprehensive examination of the historical progression of thyroid diagnostics, the discourse proceeds to explore recent developments, highlighting the paramount importance of accuracy in testing methods. The primary issue under consideration is the crucial requirement for accuracy in the field of therapeutic practice. The review critically examines the problems related to the interpretation, standardization, and ethical considerations in examining advanced laboratory techniques, novel biomarkers, and state-of-the-art technologies like immunoassays, molecular testing, and automation. The focus on the paradigm shift towards precision diagnostics brings attention to the complex connection between test results and their direct influence on patient care. This investigation expands upon the incorporation of imaging and molecular diagnostics, highlighting the rising significance of precision in customizing treatment strategies. In summary, the study provides a prospective viewpoint, recognizing the persistent obstacles and highlighting the want for dependable, uniform methodologies in thyroid diagnostics. This narrative's primary objective is to guide physicians, researchers, and stakeholders in effectively navigating the intricate nature of contemporary thyroid function tests, with a particular emphasis on resolving the fundamental issue of precision.

Chronic liver illnesses pose a substantial worldwide health challenge, with various causes that span from viral infections to metabolic problems. Individuals suffering from liver problems frequently face distinct difficulties in pain control, requiring a customized strategy that takes into account both the fundamental disease and the complexities of liver function. The liver, a vital organ responsible for metabolic control and detoxification, is pivotal in multiple physiological processes. Chronic liver illnesses, such as cirrhosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), are marked by a gradual process of inflammation and fibrosis, resulting in reduced liver function. These disorders often come with pain, varying from internal discomfort to intense abdominal pain, which impacts the quality of life and general well-being of patients.The review explores the complex aspects of pain perception in liver illnesses, including inflammation, modified neuronal signaling, and the influence of comorbidities. It highlights the significance of a detailed comprehension of the pain experience in individuals with hepatic conditions for the implementation of successful pain management treatments. In addition, the review emphasizes the difficulties involved in treating pain in this group of patients, such as the possible complications linked to commonly prescribed pain relievers and the necessity for collaboration between hepatologists, pain specialists, and other healthcare professionals. Moreover, it examines new possibilities in the domain, such as the significance of innovative pharmacological substances, non-pharmacological treatments, and personalized medicine strategies designed for specific patient characteristics. This study thoroughly analyzes the difficulties and possibilities involved in creating personalized pain management approaches for individuals with liver conditions. Its purpose is to guide physicians, researchers, and healthcare providers, enabling them to implement more efficient and patient-focused interventions. As our comprehension of liver-related pain progresses, the potential for enhancing the quality of life for persons with chronic liver disorders through tailored pain management measures becomes more and more encouraging.

Ovarian cancer, being one of the prevalent gynecological cancers, warrants a therapy that’s both effective and well tolerated. After extensive drug testing, combination regimens with paclitaxel plus platinum-based agents such as cisplatin/carboplatin and taxanes, have shown promising results for advanced ovarian cancer. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of two treatment regimens for advanced ovarian cancer: cisplatin/paclitaxel and carboplatin/paclitaxel.PubMed (Medline), Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2023. The meta-analysis included patients with histologically verified International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIB to IV ovarian carcinoma who received either carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/paclitaxel. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL), complete response rate (CRR), and partial response rate (PRR). The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was used to assess the quality of the RCTsThe five RCTs chosen for this statistical analysis consisted of a total of 2239 participants, with 1109 receiving paclitaxel/cisplatin for treatment and the remaining 1130 receiving carboplatin/paclitaxel. Among all included outcomes, these reported significant findings: QoL (p-value=0.0002), thrombocytopenia (p=<0.00001), neurological toxicity (p-value=0.003), nausea/vomiting (p-value=<0.00001), myalgia/arthralgia (p-value=0.02), and febrile neutropenia (p-value=0.01).We concluded that the carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet endows a better quality of life (QOL) to patients along with significantly fewer gastrointestinal and neurological toxicities when compared with the cisplatin/paclitaxel combination. However, the myelosuppressive effects of carboplatin/paclitaxel remain a point of concern and may require clinical management.

This narrative review explores the complex relationship between cancer medicines and cardiovascular health in the junction of oncology and cardiology, known as cardio-oncology. The study examines the historical development of cancer treatments and highlights the growing importance of cardiovascular problems in patient care. This text delves into the topic of cardiotoxicity, examining both conventional chemotherapeutic drugs like anthracyclines and more recent tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The complex molecular and cellular mechanisms that control cardiovascular problems are explained, including an understanding of how genetic predisposition influences an individual's sensitivity. The narrative expands into the crucial realm of risk stratification and evaluation, revealing advanced instruments for identifying cardiovascular risk in cancer patients. The importance of non-invasive imaging methods and biomarkers in early detection and continuous monitoring is emphasized.The prioritization of preventive tactics emphasizes the need to take proactive measures incorporating therapies to protect the heart throughout cancer treatment. It also highlights the significance of making lifestyle improvements to reduce risk factors. The narrative emphasizes the changing collaborative treatment environment, advocating for merging oncologists and cardiologists in a coordinated endeavor to maximize patient outcomes. In addition to clinical factors, the review explores the critical domain of patient education and support, acknowledging its crucial role in promoting informed decision-making and improving overall patient well-being. The latter portions of the text anticipate and consider upcoming treatments and existing research efforts that offer the potential for the future of cardio-oncology. This review seeks to provide a detailed viewpoint on the intricate connection between cancer treatments and cardiovascular well-being. Its objective is to encourage a more profound comprehension of the subject and prompt careful contemplation regarding the comprehensive care of cancer patients who confront the intricate difficulties presented by their treatment plans.

The relationship between insulin resistance and coronary artery disease (CAD) is a crucial study area in understanding the complex connection between metabolic dysregulation and cardiovascular morbidity. This scholarly investigation examines the intricate relationship between insulin resistance, a key characteristic of metabolic syndrome, and CAD development. The goal is to understand the detailed molecular and physiological connections that underlie the dangerous connection between the endocrine and cardiac systems. The recognition of insulin resistance as a key player in cardiovascular disease highlights the need to study the complex relationships between insulin signaling pathways and the development of atherosclerosis. This research analyzes the molecular processes by which insulin resistance leads to disruptions in lipid metabolism, inflammatory reactions, and malfunction of the blood vessel's inner lining. These processes create an environment that promotes the development and advancement of CAD. As we begin this scientific exploration, it becomes clear that insulin resistance acts as a metabolic indicator and a potent mediator of endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and systemic inflammation. The complex interaction between insulin-sensitive tissues and the vascular endothelium plays a crucial role in defining the pathophysiological landscape of CAD. Furthermore, this discussion highlights the mutual interaction between the endocrine and cardiac systems, where CAD produced by myocardial ischemia worsens insulin resistance through complex molecular pathways. Discovering new therapeutic targets that disrupt the harmful cycle between insulin resistance and the development of CAD shows potential for creating specific therapies to reduce cardiovascular risk in people with insulin resistance. This study aims to clarify the complexities of the connection between the endocrine system and the heart, establishing the basis for a thorough comprehension of how insulin resistance contributes to the development and advancement of CAD.

The increasing worldwide prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) highlights the need to understand the complex relationships between lipid abnormalities and elevated cardiovascular risk. This review thoroughly investigates the complex terrain of lipid abnormalities, highlighting their crucial significance in developing CVDs. Dyslipidemia, which is closely connected to atherosclerosis, is a significant risk factor for CVDs, including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. This review thoroughly examines the intricate relationship between lipoproteins, cholesterol metabolism, and the inflammatory cascade, providing a detailed comprehension of the mechanisms that contribute to atherogenic processes. An extensive analysis of the occurrence and distribution of lipid diseases worldwide indicates a concerning high frequency, which calls for a reassessment of public health approaches. Dyslipidemia is caused by a combination of genetic predispositions, lifestyle factors, and metabolic abnormalities, as supported by significant data. Moreover, investigating different types of lipoproteins and their specific functions in the development of atherosclerosis provides insight into the complex causes of CVDs. In addition to conventional lipid profiles, newly identified biomarkers and advanced imaging techniques are being carefully examined for their ability to improve risk classification and treatment strategies' effectiveness. From a critical perspective, the review thoroughly examines the current state of lipid-modifying medicines, specifically statins, fibrates, and new therapeutic approaches. The text discusses the emerging concept of precision medicine, which involves tailoring treatment approaches to individuals based on their genetic and molecular characteristics. This approach has the potential to improve treatment outcomes. In addition, this study critically assesses the effects of lifestyle changes and nutritional interventions on lipid homeostasis, offering a comprehensive view of preventive strategies. This review consolidates current viewpoints on lipid diseases and their complex correlation with cardiovascular risk. This review contributes to the ongoing cardiovascular disease prevention and management dialogue by clarifying the molecular mechanisms, exploring new therapeutic options, and considering broader societal implications.

Thyroid dysfunction is a widespread and complex issue in the field of endocrine disorders. It has a significant impact on multiple physiological systems, particularly on the heart. This review explores the complex interaction between thyroid dysfunction and cardiac dynamics, examining the detailed network of molecular, cellular, and systemic changes that underlie the close connection between these two physiological areas. Thyroid dysfunction, which includes both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, is a common endocrine condition that affects millions of people worldwide. The thyroid hormones thyroxine and triiodothyronine regulate various metabolic activities essential for maintaining cellular balance. Disruptions in thyroid function result in widespread consequences, affecting the cardiovascular system. Thyroid hormones directly impact cardiac muscle cells, controlling their ability to contract, their electrical properties, and their reaction to hypertrophy. Thyroid dysfunction goes beyond the level of individual cells and involves complex interactions among vascular dynamics, neurohormonal control, and endothelial function. These factors all contribute to the development of cardiovascular illness. The impact of thyroid dysfunction on cardiac structure, function, and outcomes is not limited to a one-way pattern. Instead, it involves a dynamic two-way interaction. The manifestations of this condition can vary from minor changes in the electrical activity of the heart to more obvious structural abnormalities, such as an increase in the size of the heart muscle and a decrease in its ability to relax during the filling phase. Furthermore, the correlation between thyroid dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as heart failure and arrhythmias, highlights the clinical importance of this connection. This review provides a complete overview of the relationship between thyroid dysfunction and cardiac dynamics by analyzing a wide range of research from clinical, molecular, and epidemiological perspectives. This study seeks to enhance our comprehension of the comprehensive effects of thyroid dysfunction on the anatomy and function of the heart by explaining the complex molecular mechanisms and systemic consequences. The goal is to establish a basis for informed clinical treatment and future research efforts.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) results from proliferative remodeling and narrowing of the pulmonary vasculature. Sotatercept is a first-in-class fusion protein that has recently garnered attention for showing improvements in patients with PAH. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assesses the overall efficacy of Sotatercept in treating PAH.PubMed, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched using relevant keywords and MeSH terms. Studies were included if RCTs compared Sotatercept with placebo in patients with PAH.Our comprehensive literature search yielded 3,127 results, of which two RCTs with 429 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The patients were on background therapy for PAH. Results of the meta-analysis show that when compared with placebo, Sotatercept improved the six-minute walk distance (mean difference [MD] 34.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.02-50.95; P < 0.0001), the World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (odds ratio [OR] 2.50; 95% CI 1.50-4.15; P = 0.0004), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR, MD -253.90; 95% CI -356.05 to -151.75; P < 0.00001). However, reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, MD -1563.14; 95% CI -3271.93 to 145.65; P = 0.07) was not statistically significant in the Sotatercept group versus placebo.In conclusion, Sotatercept improves the six-minute walk distance, WHO functional class, and PVR in patients with PAH receiving background therapy. However, the effect on NT-proBNP levels was not statistically significant. More research is needed to assess the clinical relevance of these findings.