Melvin Goodman is a journalist and author known for his critical analysis of U.S. foreign policy and intelligence agencies. He has written extensively on topics such as war-mongering, media bias, and the Middle East. His articles often provide a dissenting perspective and challenge mainstream narratives.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
Not enough data
Melvin's coverage predominantly focuses on world affairs, government & politics, with a keen interest in the Biden administration's foreign policy and international relations. Given his emphasis on government announcements and expert commentary, he is likely to be receptive to pitches offering insights from credible experts in international relations or political analysis.
Based on his article titles, Melvin appears critical of mainstream media and US foreign policy. If you have unique perspectives or analysis related to the topics covered such as Israel, media bias, war or the Biden administration’s approach to international relations that could challenge conventional narratives, it may resonate with him.
As Melvin has a national focus within the United States but covers global issues extensively, ensure any pitched content relates specifically to how these issues impact U.S. policies and actions abroad.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
Photograph of President Reagan and Vice-President Bush meeting with General Secretary Gorbachev.
A car fire allegedly caused by an exploding pager. Photograph Source: Mehr News Agency – CC BY 4.0
Photograph Source: The U.S. Army – Public Domain There has been a deplorable consistency in the remarks and efforts of Robert M.
The mainstream media has been largely critical of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s dangerous use of military power, and largely supportive of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s equally dangerous use of military power. The leading proponents of these contrasting views have been David Ignatius in the Washington Post and Bret Stephens in the New York Times.
“Israeli Military Wins Back Stature Lost on Oct. 7,” – The New York Times, October 4, 2024. “A military asserts itself as an ‘anchor of strength'.”
Photograph Source: Rob Pierson – CC BY 2.0 “Gaza's Are Trapped in a Prison That Was Decades in the Making,” – Mark Landler, New York Times, October 8, 2024.
Both Friedman and Stephens argue that it is up to the Palestinians to take the lead in building a more politically moderate Middle East and to create conditions for the start of real diplomacy. Neither Friedman nor Stephens acknowledges the difficult task of getting access to a new Hamas leadership or the even more difficult task of getting a notoriously right-wing Israeli government to compromise on any aspect of an Arab-Israeli peace plan. Stephens risibly refers to the possibility of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “living up to his Churchillian self-image,” (whatever that could possibly mean).
By: Melvin Goodman
Jeff Bezo during a CNN interview. Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos is getting his share of criticism for stopping the paper's presidential
In its description of Israel’s “strategic position,” the Times has forgotten that prior to October 7, Israel’s borders were quiet, particularly the northern border with Lebanon. Israel had domestic concerns due to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s efforts to weaken the Israeli Supreme Court and his formation of the most right-wing government in Israel’s history. But Israel’s economy was strong, and its economic dealings with various Arab countries due to the Abraham Accords was offering a measure of stability to the region. There was even discussion of an Israeli-Saudi Arabian accord that would include a U.S. defense agreement with Saudi Arabia.
By: Melvin Goodman
“…the United States and Israel are making significant progress toward stabilizing three dangerous wars: Israel's tit-for-tat conflict with Iran, the
(833) 317-6278 
