Monica Kingsley is a financial journalist and contributor to various publications, including TalkMarkets, FXStreet, and Advisorpedia. Her articles primarily focus on market analysis, trading strategies, and economic trends. Monica's work has been featured in NXTmine, ValueWalk, Barchart, and other platforms.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Monica Kingsley's focus primarily revolves around investment analysis, particularly related to the stock market and trading. She is likely seeking insights into economic indicators impacting financial markets, such as international trade data, monetary policy decisions, and key trends in the stock market.
Given her coverage attributes, Monica would be most receptive to pitches offering expert opinions or analyses on current economic indicators that have a direct impact on financial markets. This could include topics like central bank policies, trade balances of major economies or regions, and their potential impacts on specific asset classes.
Considering her lack of geographic focus but strong emphasis on global economic indicators with an investment perspective, experts with a deep understanding of how macroeconomic events influence financial markets internationally may find success in reaching out to Monica.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
S&P 500 retreated in the pre-PPI uncertainty, offered a great swing entry point in the initial flush to 5,825 support, and then the UoM consumer
S&P 500 retreated in the pre-PPI uncertainty, offered a great swing entry point in the initial flush to 5,825 support, and then the UoM consumer data lent further support to the buyers – much to the satisfaction of all clients.
S&P 500 opening push was rejected, and the reasons were related to discretionaries and ASML bookings of course.
S&P 500 went for new ATHs on the good retail sales and tame unemployment claims I predicted (multiple clues), overcoming Monday‘s pre- ASML highs premarket.
S&P 500 didn't bat an eyelid on weaker housing data, and why should it? Premium given 5,912 resistance is seeing quite some (buying) interest – the range narrowing, and price action getting further away from the 5,872 – 5,885 support. Greed, or even extreme greed knocking on the door?
S&P 500 took a premarket dive, struggled for direction during the open, and rebounded to make a lower high. Led by Nasdaq that has a better chart structure, and lately discussed AI universe led by companies beneting from
S&P 500 didn‘t challenge Tuesday‘s highs, and wasn‘t bid up after the opening bell either.
S&P 500 retraced some of Wednesday‘s decline, dipped after the open only to push higher into the close – again, and again clients profited both short and long (Ellin‘s TSLA call move ended up smashing – let‘s see how the stock trades today, whether it can sustain the momentum to the finishing line Friday).
And it just may not be over, or is it? S&P 500 was lifted by earlier GOOGL earnings, AMD underwhelmed on cash flow generation, and I was bearish
And it just may not be over, or is it? S&P 500 was lifted by earlier GOOGL earnings, AMD underwhelmed on cash flow generation, and I was bearish given the high expectations and valuations of MSFT and META.
(833) 317-6278 
