Scott Mollen is a journalist focused on local real estate law in New York City. He writes for The American Lawyer and his articles cover a range of topics including mortgage foreclosures, property rights, and legal challenges related to real estate transactions.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Scott Mollen's coverage is heavily focused on real estate law and legal compliance, particularly within the New York City area. He frequently covers topics such as attorney fees, tax assessment, brokers' commission, preferential rent, mortgage arrears, guaranty agreements, damages and statute of limitations.
Given his strong emphasis on local legal developments in real estate law within New York City and potentially broader areas in the United States as well as a focus on announcement articles and legal policy regulation themes it's recommended to reach out with expert insights into recent local or federal legal changes impacting real estate practices or landmark court cases that could set new precedents affecting the industry. This information should be tailored to suit his focus which appears strongly regional (New York) but also encompasses national implications at times.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Scott Mollen, Kenneth Schwartz, Karen Hoffman
Scott Mollen discusses “Masseroli v. Gatfield,” and “U.S. Bank, National Association v. Nosratabdi.”
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “1532-1609 Ocean Ave LLC v. Hertzan where the court held that common law fraud should no longer be the standard for pleading or proving fraudulent deregulation and that a “broader more flexible definition of fraud better serves the public policy behind rent stabilization.”
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “1532-1609 Ocean Ave LLC v. Hertzan" where the court held that common law fraud should no longer be the standard for pleading or proving fraudulent deregulation and that a “broader more flexible definition of fraud better serves the public policy behind rent stabilization.”
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “62-64 Third Ave LP v. Elvis Café,” and “Trento 67 v. OneWest Bank.”
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “62-64 Third Ave LP v. Elvis Café,” and “Trento 67 v. OneWest Bank.”
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “New York University v. City of New York,” and “724 Management LLC v. Santander Bank.”
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “COD, LLC v. Ljuljdjuraj,” and “Rojas v. Roche.”
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “Conlon Holdings LLC v. Chanos & Company” which illustrates that “courts are reluctant to grant prejudgment injunctions based on mere allegations by a claimant that a defendant or respondent intends to dissipate assets.”
By: Emily Saul, Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “Castaneda v. Serrano,” involving an alleged forged deed, and “Federal National Mortgage Association v. 204 Ellery St.” dealing with baseless objections to a receivership.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “Castaneda v. Serrano,” involving an alleged forged deed, and “Federal National Mortgage Association v. 204 Ellery St.” dealing with baseless objections to a receivership.
(833) 317-6278 