Scott Mollen is a partner at Herrick, Feinstein. He specializes in law and legal affairs, focusing on civil and family law, litigation, and real estate, particularly in commercial and residential sectors. Scott has been featured in NewsBreak and The American Lawyer, where he discusses significant legal cases and trends in the housing market and property management.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
New York, United States (Local)
Not enough data
Scott Mollen's coverage is heavily focused on real estate law and legal compliance, particularly within the New York City area. He frequently covers topics such as attorney fees, tax assessment, brokers' commission, preferential rent, mortgage arrears, guaranty agreements, damages and statute of limitations.
Given his strong emphasis on local legal developments in real estate law within New York City and potentially broader areas in the United States as well as a focus on announcement articles and legal policy regulation themes it's recommended to reach out with expert insights into recent local or federal legal changes impacting real estate practices or landmark court cases that could set new precedents affecting the industry. This information should be tailored to suit his focus which appears strongly regional (New York) but also encompasses national implications at times.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses 'County Acquisitions v. Lanser,' in which the court found that a village unlawfully took a homeowner's surplus equity after a tax foreclosure, and 'Handl Capital 531 LLC v. New Generation Holdings,' where the court refused to stop a foreclosure sale based on an untimely challenge to the mortgage.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘MTGLQ Invs., L.P. v. Emego,' where the court upheld a foreclosure sale despite a bankruptcy filing, finding no automatic stay applied after multiple dismissed petitions, and ‘201 Linden Blvd Partners LLC v. Milo,' where the court allowed rent-overcharge discovery and ordered correction of housing-code violations.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘MTGLQ Invs., L.P. v. Emego,’ where the court upheld a foreclosure sale despite a bankruptcy filing, finding no automatic stay applied after multiple dismissed petitions, and ‘201 Linden Blvd Partners LLC v. Milo,’ where the court allowed rent-overcharge discovery and ordered correction of housing-code violations.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses '1992 Third Realty v. Third Avenue NY Realty,' an appellate court decision regarding negligence claims between adjacent property owners in Manhattan related to construction delays caused by excavation work.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses '1992 Third Realty v. Third Avenue NY Realty,' an appellate court decision regarding negligence claims between adjacent property owners in Manhattan related to construction delays caused by excavation work.
By: Scott Mollen
Condo Board Wins Charges Dispute: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘Century Apts. Assoc. v. Winston,' where the court weighed in on whether a rent-controlled tenant's chronic late and nonpayments were enough to justify ending the tenancy, and ‘Levin v. City of Buffalo,' asking whether the City had a true emergency that justified demolishing a building without giving the owners a hearing first.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘Century Apts. Assoc. v. Winston,’ where the court weighed in on whether a rent-controlled tenant’s chronic late and nonpayments were enough to justify ending the tenancy, and ‘Levin v. City of Buffalo,’ asking whether the City had a true emergency that justified demolishing a building without giving the owners a hearing first.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses Village of Fairport v. American Park Place, where the court dismissed counterclaims challenging a village code-enforcement action, and U.S. Bank N.A. v. Speller, where the court held a foreclosure renewal motion in abeyance pending notice to the attorney general on FAPA retroactivity issues.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses Village of Fairport v. American Park Place, where the court dismissed counterclaims challenging a village code-enforcement action, and U.S. Bank N.A. v. Speller, where the court held a foreclosure renewal motion in abeyance pending notice to the attorney general on FAPA retroactivity issues.
