Scott Mollen is a partner at Herrick, Feinstein. He specializes in law and legal affairs, with a focus on civil and family law, legislation, and legal technology, discussing notable cases such as 'Rush Props. v. Riveros', 'Food First HDFC v. Turner', and 'Mayfair Resort Homeowners Ass'n v. LG Lakeside Living'. Scott's insights and expertise have been featured in NewsBreak and The American Lawyer.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
New York, United States (Local)
Not enough data
Scott Mollen's coverage is heavily focused on real estate law and legal compliance, particularly within the New York City area. He frequently covers topics such as attorney fees, tax assessment, brokers' commission, preferential rent, mortgage arrears, guaranty agreements, damages and statute of limitations.
Given his strong emphasis on local legal developments in real estate law within New York City and potentially broader areas in the United States as well as a focus on announcement articles and legal policy regulation themes it's recommended to reach out with expert insights into recent local or federal legal changes impacting real estate practices or landmark court cases that could set new precedents affecting the industry. This information should be tailored to suit his focus which appears strongly regional (New York) but also encompasses national implications at times.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Scott Mollen
This week, Scott Mollen discusses ‘Delshah 60 Ninth v. Free People,' where the court held that the tenant did not have to pay rent while COVID-19 orders kept its store closed, and ‘1378 Bedford v. Watson,' where it was held that the landlord could collect rent only after it bought the building.
By: Scott Mollen
Realty Law Digest
By: Scott Mollen
In this week's Realty Law Digest, Scott Mollen discusses ‘22 Tomahawk Drive LLC v. Hiser-Chason,' involving a disputed escrow deposit after a minor delay in obtaining a certificate of occupancy, and ‘Yonthan & Ethan LLC v. Zahabian,' involving confirmation of a Bais Din arbitration award in a commercial lease dispute.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses two landlord-tenant decisions: ‘Lopez v. Evergreen Terrace LLC,' where the court said a landlord still had to repair a fire-damaged rent-stabilized building despite wanting to demolish it, and ‘29-28 41st Ave. Owner LLC v. Parzinger Design Inc.,' where the court let a landlord correct a Good Cause Eviction Law notice error in a nonpayment case.
By: Scott Mollen
In this week's Realty Law Digest, Scott Mollen discusses 'S&L Star Realty, LLC v. Barkagan' and '140 E 35th St. LLC v. Booker,' two commercial landlord-tenant disputes involving lease renewal rights and an LLC landlord's ability to proceed with a nonpayment case.
By: Scott Mollen
This week, Scott Mollen reviews Lazos v. Southold Town Board, where a court ordered coastal erosion permits issued after finding legal errors; 207-209 West 107th Street v. Cruz, where a successor tenant won attorney fees; and Brusseau v. 9 Dekalb Fee Owner LLC, where a tenant won damages over excessive apartment noise.
By: Scott Mollen
This week, Scott Mollen discusses ‘Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Moran,' where the court rejected a borrower's bad-faith loss mitigation defense, finding that CPLR §3408(f)'s good-faith obligation applies to mandatory settlement conferencing—not later voluntary loan-modification talks.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses 'County Acquisitions v. Lanser,' in which the court found that a village unlawfully took a homeowner's surplus equity after a tax foreclosure, and 'Handl Capital 531 LLC v. New Generation Holdings,' where the court refused to stop a foreclosure sale based on an untimely challenge to the mortgage.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘MTGLQ Invs., L.P. v. Emego,' where the court upheld a foreclosure sale despite a bankruptcy filing, finding no automatic stay applied after multiple dismissed petitions, and ‘201 Linden Blvd Partners LLC v. Milo,' where the court allowed rent-overcharge discovery and ordered correction of housing-code violations.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘MTGLQ Invs., L.P. v. Emego,’ where the court upheld a foreclosure sale despite a bankruptcy filing, finding no automatic stay applied after multiple dismissed petitions, and ‘201 Linden Blvd Partners LLC v. Milo,’ where the court allowed rent-overcharge discovery and ordered correction of housing-code violations.
