Scott Mollen is a partner at Herrick, Feinstein. He specializes in law and legal affairs, with a focus on civil and family law, legislation, and legal technology, discussing notable cases such as 'Rush Props. v. Riveros', 'Food First HDFC v. Turner', and 'Mayfair Resort Homeowners Ass'n v. LG Lakeside Living'. Scott's insights and expertise have been featured in NewsBreak and The American Lawyer.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
New York City, United States (Local)
Not enough data
Scott Mollen's coverage is heavily focused on real estate law and legal compliance, particularly within the New York City area. He frequently covers topics such as attorney fees, tax assessment, brokers' commission, preferential rent, mortgage arrears, guaranty agreements, damages and statute of limitations.
Given his strong emphasis on local legal developments in real estate law within New York City and potentially broader areas in the United States as well as a focus on announcement articles and legal policy regulation themes it's recommended to reach out with expert insights into recent local or federal legal changes impacting real estate practices or landmark court cases that could set new precedents affecting the industry. This information should be tailored to suit his focus which appears strongly regional (New York) but also encompasses national implications at times.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘57th & 6th Ground LLC v. Carnegie House Tenants Corp,' where the court confirmed an arbitration award in a ground-rent dispute after finding that alleged arbitrator misconduct created an appearance of impropriety but did not cause the actual prejudice required to vacate the award.
Scott Mollen discusses “Bogom-Shanonv. Altman, Civil Court,”where the court held that a landlord's oral explanation for withholding a security deposit does not satisfy the HSTPA's written notice requirement; and“Matter of Yeung v. Assessor of the Village of Great Neck Estates," where the appellate court ruled that homeowners may challenge the residential assessment ratio in SCAR proceedings.
By: Scott Mollen
This week, Scott Mollen discusses “298 East Village Owner LLC v. Stewart,” where the court held that a landlord validly terminated a residential lease after selling the apartment and properly notifying the tenant, and “Kong 328 Realty Corp. v. Robinson,” where the court found uncorrected rent-impairing violations justified a 100% rent abatement.
By: Scott Mollen
This week, Scott Mollen discusses “298 East Village Owner LLC v. Stewart,” where the court held that a landlord validly terminated a residential lease after selling the apartment and properly notifying the tenant, and “Kong 328 Realty Corp. v. Robinson,” where the court found uncorrected rent-impairing violations justified a 100% rent abatement.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses Enterprise v. Shvo, where the court dismissed most claims arising from a failed luxury club partnership, while allowing limited claims to proceed.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses ‘Cavaluzzi v. County of Sullivan' where the U.S. District Court for the Southern District held that Sullivan County violated the Takings Clause by retaining surplus proceeds from tax foreclosure sales.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses "Tell v. 9 West 73rd St. LLC," where a federal court dismissed a transgender tenant's Fair Housing Act claims, finding the complaint failed to allege severe discriminatory harassment or conduct motivated by sex, gender, or sexual orientation.
This week, Scott Mollen discusses two landlord-tenant decisions: ‘Bedrock Equities LLC v. Husain,' holding that a landlord pursuing a Good Cause Eviction Law holdover against a month-to-month tenant for nonpayment need only provide the statutory notice language required by the law, and ‘West Bushwick TPT HDFC v. Demmer,' which partially granting a tenant's discovery demands in a nuisance holdover proceeding while rejecting overly broad “fishing expedition” requests.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “10MSW17D LLC v. Board of Mgrs. of 10 Madison Sq. W,” where the court upheld a condominium board's authority to restrict certain members from using building amenities.
By: Scott Mollen
Scott Mollen discusses “Oxford Capital Third Avenue LLC v. 554-556 Manager, LLC,” where the court upheld a multimillion-dollar arbitration award, rejecting efforts to vacate the award and reaffirming the limited grounds for overturning arbitration decisions; and “Elliot Place Estates LLC v. Williams,” where a Housing Court judge dismissed a landlord's nonpayment case after finding that the process server failed to adequately prove service of process, including by not producing GPS records.
