Sigal Samuel is an editor and writer for Vox and Editor & Publisher (E&P) Magazine. Her work focuses on a range of topics, including politics, technology, and social issues. She has also been featured in publications such as The Forward and RealClearMarkets.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
Not enough data
Sigal Samuel's articles cover a wide range of topics, including scientific subjects like psychedelics and AI, as well as political issues such as the Israel-Palestine conflict. The coverage attributes reveal a tendency to cite data and report on government announcements.
If you're looking to reach out effectively to Sigal, offering access or insights into relevant scientific research or data could be particularly appealing. Additionally, experts in policy analysis related to big tech regulation or geopolitical affairs may find their perspectives welcome for her pieces covering these themes.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
Introducing Your Mileage May Vary, a new type of ethical advice column from Vox.
The safety paradox at the heart of OpenAI's “Strawberry” model OpenAI, the company that brought you ChatGPT, is trying something different.
The maker of ChatGPT promised to share its profits with the public. But Sam Altman just sold you out.
By: Sigal Samuel
Sam Altman is a Technocrat who plays the long game. When he first got involved with OpenAI in 2015, he jockeyed to take the helm in 2019 but he was constrained by a board of directors. By 2023, the Board saw through him and ousted him. Then the real Sam Altman appeared as he "clawed his way back to power", kicked the directors off the board and reconstituted another board subservient to him.
I don't know what I owe my newfound relative. Your Mileage May Vary is an advice column offering you a new framework for thinking through your ethical dilemmas and philosophical questions.
The public did not consent to artificial general intelligence.
AI companies are trying to build God. Shouldn't they ask our permission first?
By: Sigal Samuel
When a handful of innovators rise up to literally change the world, for better or worse, shouldn't the public have a say beforehand? AI is an oxymoron: only humans possess intelligence, not machines. Perhaps machines need a god to police themselves, but to say the machine god is, therefore, suitable to serve as the god of humanity is a logical disconnect, if not outright stupid. Yet, this is exactly where the AI titans are headed. Does the public have a right to informed consent, or should it blindly follow the Pied Pipers to their destruction?
My faith gave me my moral values. I want my child to have those — without all the stuff I don't believe in.
How can you know if you truly want to be a parent?
(833) 317-6278 
