Stephen M. Walt is a Professor of International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School. He is known for his expertise in international relations and foreign policy, and his work has been featured in various publications including Harvard's Belfer Center and Foreign Policy. Walt's articles often provide insightful analysis and offer a realist perspective on global affairs.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
International
Stephen M. Walt predominantly covers world affairs, government & politics with a focus on foreign policy, international relations, war, and diplomacy. His articles often feature opinion editorials alongside coverage of government announcements and legal policy regulation.
Given his emphasis on these topics, individuals with expertise in foreign policy analysis or diplomatic relations may find success in reaching out to Stephen for commentary or insights on global political events, particularly those involving the United States' role in international affairs.
Additionally, considering the strong presence of opinion editorials in his work, experts who can provide nuanced perspectives and well-reasoned arguments within the realm of international relations and foreign policy could also capture his interest.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
Rejecting diplomacy by citing Neville Chamberlain's deal with the Nazis is a willfully ignorant use of history.
Israel is in growing danger—but the responsibility lies more in Washington than in Tehran
A how-to guide for university students from a sympathetic observer.
Scholars and policymakers are still trying to understand what would happen after Tehran acquires a nuclear weapon.
Yet despite these far-reaching effects, the current pandemic will not transform the essential nature of world politics. The territorial state will remain the basic building-block of international affairs, nationalism will remain a powerful political force, and the major powers will continue to compete for influence in myriad ways. Global institutions, transnational networks, and assorted non-state actors will still play important roles, of course, but the present crisis will not produce a dramatic and enduring increase in global governance or significantly higher levels of international cooperation
The U.S. military’s collapsed pier in Gaza is symbolic of a much bigger issue.
This white paper attempts to apply history to illuminate possible paths forward but is neither a detailed blueprint for peace nor an intricate playbook for how negotiations should proceed. With any negotiated settlement, the devil is in the details, and questions such as the prosecution of war crimes, repatriation of prisoners of war (POWs), reparations, and specific territorial lines will undoubtedly be debated fiercely by Moscow and Kyiv. The specific contours of any deal will be ironed out at the negotiating table. Additionally, significant negotiations are unlikely to take place in the lame-duck period prior to the US presidential election. Our recommendations are therefore not an immediate call for action but guidelines for policymakers if and when Ukraine decides to negotiate.
The conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine can only end with deals that don't satisfy anyone completely.
Amid China's rise, Americans should ask what Beijing is doing right—and what they're doing wrong.
By: Stephen M. Walt, Graham Allison
The Current Situation with the Judicial Reform in Russia Sergey A. Pashin The following is the text of a presentation read by Sergey A.
(833) 317-6278 
