Amy Howe is an editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a widely respected source for news and analysis on the United States Supreme Court. With a focus on national issues, Amy covers a range of topics related to the court, including cases, rulings, and legal developments. Her work has also been featured in Woodlands Online and Yonkers Tribune.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Amy Howe's reporting focuses on legal policy and regulation, specifically Supreme Court cases and judiciary matters. She frequently covers government, politics, and legal compliance issues at the national level in the United States.
If you are reaching out to Amy, consider providing expert commentary or analysis on ongoing or upcoming Supreme Court cases and their potential impact on legal policy. Additionally, if there are advocacy efforts related to the topics she covers, sharing insights into those could be valuable.
Given her focus on national coverage of US legal matters involving the Supreme Court and judiciary system, expertise in these areas would likely be most relevant for effective outreach.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Amy Howe
The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to decide whether a 2019 law that seeks to give U.S. courts the power to hear claims by victims of terrorism against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority violates the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of fair treatment. Fuld v.
By: Amy Howe
The Supreme Court on Monday morning declined to take up several hot-button issues, including a challenge by parents to a school district’s plan to provide support for transgender and non-binary students, a dispute over the admissions policy used during the 2021-22 school year for three of Boston’s e
By: Amy Howe
The Supreme Court on Monday morning declined to take up several hot-button issues, including a challenge by parents to a school district’s plan to provide support for transgender and non-binary students, a dispute over the admissions policy used during the 2021-22 school year for three of Boston’s elite public high schools, and the case of a Hawaii man prosecuted for carrying a handgun without a license. Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the decisions not to grant review in both of the school cases.
By: Amy Howe
At oral arguments on Monday it was not clear how the Supreme Court will rule in the case of a Philadelphia-area government contractor found guilty of fraud after it failed to comply with a contract provision intended to promote diversity. In Kousisis v. United States, the justices are considering wh
Michael Dreeben argues for the United States in last term's historic presidential immunity case. (William Hennessy)
By: Amy Howe
The justices added two cases to their 2024-25 docket on Friday. (Katie Barlow)
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read: US Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson makes Broadway debut in '& Juliet' (Kaanita Iyer (CNN), via ABC7 News) Idaho AG asks U.S. Supreme Court to hea
The Supreme Court on Monday morning declined to take up a challenge to New York’s caps on the price that its low-income residents pay for broadband internet access. The denial of review in New York State Telecommunications Association v. James came on a list of orders released from the justices’ private conference on Friday.
Social media giant TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, on Monday asked the justices to block a federal law that would require TikTok to shut down in the United States unless ByteDance can sell off the U.S. company by Jan. 19. Unless the justices intervene, the companies argued in a 41-page filing, the law will “shutter one of America’s most popular speech platforms the day before a presidential inauguration.”
The Supreme Court on Wednesday morning agreed to take up a dispute over whether a South Carolina woman can bring a lawsuit challenging that state’s decision to end Planned Parenthood’s participation in its Medicaid program.
(833) 317-6278 
