Matthew Vadum is a journalist who writes for The Epoch Times and CauseACTION Clarion. He covers a wide range of topics including legal issues, politics, and social justice. His articles often focus on Supreme Court cases and their implications.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Matthew Vadum's coverage primarily focuses on legal policy and government & politics, with a significant emphasis on the Supreme Court, legal cases, lawsuits, and various civil rights issues. If you aim to reach out to him or pitch ideas for his articles, consider offering expert commentary or insights related to ongoing Supreme Court cases or significant legal developments within the government and politics sphere.
Given Vadum's focus on specific legal cases and civil rights issues such as discrimination, transgender rights, abortion rights among others it would be beneficial if your pitch is directly relevant to these topics. Additionally providing viewpoints that align with his interest in surveillance laws may also capture his attention.
Vadum has a broad geographic focus which encompasses national U.S. political and judicial matters so ensure that any suggested sources are knowledgeable about these specific areas of law within the United States.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
States say they need ‘clear and predictable rules' but civil rights groups say not requiring payment leads to abuse.
The state claims a lower court's decision to strike down the redistricting plan constitutes ‘a federal takeover' of the state's electoral system.
The plaintiffs argue that the congressional map with two majority black districts approved by state lawmakers constitutes ‘a brutal racial gerrymander.'
By: Matthew Vadum
We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE
Pro-life groups such as New Jersey-based First Choice claim they are being targeted by officials in pro-choice states.
Critics argued that it was unconstitutional for the CFPB to be funded by the Federal Reserve, instead of directly through congressional appropriations.
The government had argued that a missed deadline was fatal to the employee's appeal.
By dismissing the lawsuit, the appeals court ignored the requirements of the Federal Arbitration Act, the justices ruled.
The 2013 Maryland statute outlaws so-called assault weapons such as the AR-15 rifle. The lawsuit remains pending in a lower court.
During a firefight with U.S. forces, Ahmed Khadr threw a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier.
(833) 317-6278 
