Kim Elsesser

Wait, what?! There's been a growing backlash against workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and it's often framed as a

New research indicates working from home significantly impacts romantic relationships, contingent on couples' work-life boundary preferences. A study of dual-earner couples found that if both partners desire strict separation, increased WFH hours lead to more conflict, which leads to loneliness and discussions of separation. Conversely, couples comfortable blending work and life adapt better, experiencing less conflict. When partners hold differing boundary preferences, men report more conflict if their partner's views diverge, while women report less, suggesting women may adapt more readily. The findings caution against viewing WFH as universally beneficial, urging couples to proactively discuss boundary expectations and household responsibilities before increasing remote work.

New research suggests bringing work home may have an impact on your romantic relationship. How couples fare depends on how they view work-home boundaries.

The Federal Reserve has reverted its leader's title from "chair" to "chairman" under new head Kevin Warsh, bucking a broader trend towards gender-neutral language. This change, made despite Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell previously using "chair." While no law dictates the title, the 1913 Federal Reserve Act uses "chairman." Research indicates that gendered language like "chairman" significantly influences perceptions, associating male traits with leadership and potentially creating barriers for women. Studies show "man" as a generic term still evokes male images, and children interpret masculine job titles as male-specific. Research suggests this move reinforces stereotypes and makes it harder for women to be seen as future leaders.

The Federal Reserve has returned to using “chairman” instead of “chair.” Research shows why gendered job titles influence who we imagine belongs in leadership.

SpaceX has one woman on its nine-member board. A few years ago, that may have drawn more scrutiny. Today, one woman may be considered enough.

Two women recently defied stereotypes about female risk-taking with incredible ocean endurance feats. Kelsey Pfendler completed a record-shattering solo row from California to Hawaii in just 43 days, becoming the fastest person ever. Concurrently, Catherine Breed began an unprecedented attempt to swim the entire California coastline. Their achievements powerfully demonstrate women's capacity for ambitious, high-stakes challenges. The article highlights how women often receive discouraging feedback for risk-taking, unlike men, which can hinder their pursuit of leadership roles. Both athletes inspire others to embrace their own "big, hard, scary thing," proving that strength is found by starting despite fear.

It's been exactly 10 years since Gretchen Carlson's lawsuit against Fox CEO Roger Ailes helped propel #MeToo into the national spotlight. Here's where we stand.

Women referees have made significant strides in the men's FIFA World Cup, officiating group-stage matches in 2022 and 2026, yet no woman has served as the center referee for a knockout match. For the 2026 tournament, women comprise only 3.5% of officials. Research indicates substantial backlash against female referees, with the vast majority of social media comments being sexist or insulting, which discourages women from officiating. They also face a double standard where errors are attributed to their gender rather than individual performance. This underrepresentation of women officials is common across major sports including the NHL, MLB, NBA, and NFL. Despite these challenges, increased visibility should slowly shift perceptions, marking real, albeit gradual, progress.

New data reveals men are twice as likely as women to use AI during job interviews, specifically tools that generate real-time answers, a practice many employers consider cheating. LeanIn.Org's survey shows 20% of men compared to 10% of women employ this tactic. Men also use AI more for interview preparation, salary negotiation, and are 45% more likely to list AI skills on resumes, giving them a competitive edge. Sheryl Sandberg warns that if not prohibited, women should use AI to avoid widening gender gaps. Women's hesitation stems from less encouragement, fear of appearing incompetent, and distrust in AI, which can exhibit biases against women. Experts advise thoughtful AI use to remain competitive, rather than complete avoidance.