Matthew Vadum is a journalist who writes for The Epoch Times and CauseACTION Clarion. He covers a wide range of topics including legal issues, politics, and social justice. His articles often focus on Supreme Court cases and their implications.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Matthew Vadum's coverage primarily focuses on legal policy and government & politics, with a significant emphasis on the Supreme Court, legal cases, lawsuits, and various civil rights issues. If you aim to reach out to him or pitch ideas for his articles, consider offering expert commentary or insights related to ongoing Supreme Court cases or significant legal developments within the government and politics sphere.
Given Vadum's focus on specific legal cases and civil rights issues such as discrimination, transgender rights, abortion rights among others it would be beneficial if your pitch is directly relevant to these topics. Additionally providing viewpoints that align with his interest in surveillance laws may also capture his attention.
Vadum has a broad geographic focus which encompasses national U.S. political and judicial matters so ensure that any suggested sources are knowledgeable about these specific areas of law within the United States.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
By: Matthew Vadum
The EPA argues the Clean Air Act requires the case to be heard in Washington, not by a regional appeals court.
By: Matthew Vadum
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled a month ago that candidates' names may only be struck from the ballot if they die.
By: Matthew Vadum
Massachusetts supported the attorney’s appeal, citing a recent Supreme Court ruling on Sixth Amendment rights.
By: Matthew Vadum
The justices sent the case back to the 11th Circuit for a second look in light of a recent ruling.
By: Matthew Vadum
Complying with Kennedy’s request at this late date would be impossible, the state said.
The plaintiff argued that the District's magazine cap is unconstitutional according to a test that the Supreme Court articulated in the 2022 Bruen ruling.
Building owners says a state law is unconstitutional because, among other things, it gives tenants control over how owners use their buildings.
A trade group says the Fifth Circuit applied the wrong legal standard when it allowed the age verification requirement.
By: Matthew Vadum
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected Cornel West’s appeal of a previous ruling in a one-sentence order.
By: Matthew Vadum
The justices ruled in May that the state should move forward with this year’s elections but put off a decision on whether to hear the case until now.
(833) 317-6278 
