Matthew Vadum is a journalist who writes for The Epoch Times and CauseACTION Clarion. He covers a wide range of topics including legal issues, politics, and social justice. His articles often focus on Supreme Court cases and their implications.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Matthew Vadum's coverage primarily focuses on legal policy and government & politics, with a significant emphasis on the Supreme Court, legal cases, lawsuits, and various civil rights issues. If you aim to reach out to him or pitch ideas for his articles, consider offering expert commentary or insights related to ongoing Supreme Court cases or significant legal developments within the government and politics sphere.
Given Vadum's focus on specific legal cases and civil rights issues such as discrimination, transgender rights, abortion rights among others it would be beneficial if your pitch is directly relevant to these topics. Additionally providing viewpoints that align with his interest in surveillance laws may also capture his attention.
Vadum has a broad geographic focus which encompasses national U.S. political and judicial matters so ensure that any suggested sources are knowledgeable about these specific areas of law within the United States.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
The federal government countered that the U.S. Constitution and federal law gave it authority over the land at issue.
The high court voted to allow the national security law to come into force.
By: Matthew Vadum
The Fourth Circuit ruled against the parents last year, finding there was no evidence their constitutional rights were violated.
By: Matthew Vadum
With three days left in his presidency, Joe Biden’s declaration that the Equal Rights Amendment is ’the law of the land' met with resistance.
By: Matthew Vadum
The high court reversed the Fourth Circuit, which had sided with employees in July 2023, applying the tougher standard.
The Eighth Circuit previously ruled the family failed to prove the district acted either with ‘bad faith or gross misjudgment.'
By: Matthew Vadum
Donte Parrish says the Fourth Circuit was wrong to toss his lawsuit over a filing deadline he missed through no fault of his own.
Brenda Evers Andrew argued the prosecution should not have raised her sexual history.
By: Matthew Vadum
A federal appeals court said that special compensation payments are capped at the six-year mark.
By: Matthew Vadum
The federal government objects to the Fifth Circuit’s policy of allowing outside litigants to file suit there.
(833) 317-6278 
