Noah Feldman is a professor at Harvard Law School and a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. His work focuses on ethics, particularly responsible disruption and the regulation of AI. He has written for various publications, including Bloomberg News, The Washington Post, and The Atlantic.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Noah Feldman's coverage focuses predominantly on legal policy and government & politics, with an emphasis on opinion editorial pieces. He frequently comments on court rulings, political developments, and legal implications of high-profile cases. Given this focus, individuals with expertise in law or political analysis would be best suited to engage him.
Feldman has a national (United States) geographic focus; thus, those offering insights or commentary related to US politics, the Supreme Court decisions, and legal matters within the country are likely to garner his attention.
Considering his interest in specific topics such as Israeli politics, New York Times, OpenAI among others along with a strong inclination towards opinion editorials about governmental policies and regulations which aligns well with his writing style should guide pitches aiming for his attention.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
There are plenty of reasons to wonder why a sitting Supreme Court justice would choose to co-author a book called “Over Ruled” arguing that the U.S. has too many laws.
If Democrats conclude that supporting the Jewish state cost them the White House, Israel could very well end up the next Ukraine — captive to the outcomes of US elections.
There’s a simple, low-cost solution to the problem of prosecutorial overreach: Interpret the law according to its purpose, not its literal words.
Nearly 200 voting-related cases have churned ahead this year. But not all of them will make a difference.
He doesn't care about the harm he’s doing to free speech. He just wants a news cycle focused on Harris.
He doesn't care about the harm he's doing to free speech. He just wants a news cycle focused on Harris.
Supporting the Jewish state is one of the few issues in American political life that isn't already neatly divided along red-blue lines.
Although most of them are conservative, the justices won't be overtly partisan. They learned their lesson after Bush v. Gore.
By: Noah Feldman
The upshot is that the justices are not going to steal the election for Donald Trump, nor will they participate in election theft.
It’s a feature of constitutional democracy that presidents can’t do whatever they want. But Trump will be far less constrained than other modern presidents.
(833) 317-6278 
