By: Riley Brennan
The court's opinion makes it clear that the conduct of the defendant was reprehensible. The court reduced the amount of punitive damages, not because of the nature of the conduct, or because of the court's own feelings about the conduct, but rather on its analysis of Supreme Court law on the constitutionality of the ratio between compensatory and punitive damages, said the plaintiff's attorney, Jamie Bordas of Bordas & Bordas in Pittsburgh.